Product Comparison: Audio-Technica AT2035 vs Blue Yeti
- Very nice weight and look this microphone.
- Like the simplistic design.
- The beautiful aesthetic design. I recommend anyone to get one.
- It's a warm sounding mic; very elegant and captures the natural timbre of unprocessed, acoustic sound.
- It is a bit on the heavy side so requires a solid stand.
- The size is good and the handle and comfort to play is good.
- Very nice-looking, substantial in weight. Versatile with configurations.
- Easy to setup and create clear and crisp audio! Fairly large for the size.
- Although fairly large in size, the quality of the product is evident. Large selection of settings.
- It is very sturdy and has some weight to it. It looks and feels professional!
- Flat response, low noise, cardiod pattern, sensitive, versatile, low price.
- The frequency curve is very smooth and the bass tone remains consistent throughout the range.
- Has great frequency response and the cardioid pickup pattern was very effective in picking up a great balance of the performance vocals vs audience response.
- The audio quality is super clear and the low cut feature is really nice to have built into the mic.
- Great clarity, amazing build quality, and very low profile compared to the Blue Yeti Microphone.
- Simple to use and records great sound. I use it to record podcasts and the multiple recording patterns are a godsend. I love this mic.
- There are manual switches for both gain and recording patterns - stereo, omni, cardioid, and bi-directional.
- It’s a very sensitive microphone, it picks up a lot of low and mid frequencies.
- It also features a 3.5mm standard audio jack port which allows you to plug in earphones to get real time monitoring. I really like it.
- Amount of background noise and static detracts from what should be professional quality.