Product Comparison: GELID GC-Extreme vs Noctua NT-H1
General Specifications
Brand
GELID
Noctua
Key Specs
Thermal Conductivity
8.5 W/mK
8.5 W/mK
Compatibility
All materials
All materials
Density
2.49 g/cm3
What customers say about "Key Specs"
GELID GC-Extreme Thermal Conductive Paste
- Excellent thermal conductivity, I use it also for very high power LEDs with thermal pads in direct contact with the heat sink.
- This has been excellent stuff, using on my 6600K and have no complaints.
- Easy to spread and not too viscous.
- Dropped temps on my laptop and desktop.
- Perfect consistency and temps are great.
Noctua NT-H1 Pro-Grade Thermal Compound Paste
- It kept my 5820k nice and cool.
- High performance - Great for overclocking.
- Can be stored for later use (up to 2 years).
Features
Volume
0.053 oz.
0.123 oz.
Material
Ceramic
Ceramic
Kit Contents
Syringe with thermal paste, Protective cap, Spreader
Syringe with thermal paste, Protective cap
What customers say about "Features"
GELID GC-Extreme Thermal Conductive Paste
- Gelid GC-Extreme is easy to work with and easy to clean up.
- Good Thermal Compound as it is soft and easy to spread out.
- Non conductive is a nice feature.
- This is the best thermal interface material available.
- Absolutely amazing stuff. Amazing kit content.
Warranty / Certifications
Certifications
RoHS
RoHS
Other Information
Popular Comparisons
Thermaltake TG-8
Thermaltake TG-8
vs
Thermal Grizzly Hydronaut
Thermal Grizzly Hydronaut
vs
ARCTIC Silver 5 (AS5-3.5G)
ARCTIC Silver 5 (AS5-3.5G)
vs
Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut
Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut
vs
Thermaltake TG-4
Thermaltake TG-4
vs
ARCTIC MX-4
ARCTIC MX-4
vs
ARCTIC MX-4
ARCTIC MX-4
vs
Corsair TM30
Corsair TM30
vs
Corsair XTM50
Corsair XTM50
vs
ARCTIC MX-4
ARCTIC MX-4
vs
ARCTIC MX-4
ARCTIC MX-4
vs
ARCTIC Silver 5 (AS5-3.5G)
ARCTIC Silver 5 (AS5-3.5G)
vs
Deepcool Z9
Deepcool Z9
vs
ARCTIC MX-4
ARCTIC MX-4
vs
Thermal Grizzly Aeronaut
Thermal Grizzly Aeronaut
vs