Product Comparison: Intel Pentium T4200 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T6600
General Specifications
Brand
Intel
Intel
Model
Pentium T4200
Core 2 Duo T6600
Origin
China
China
About the Product
The Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 is an entry to mid-range dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the Penryn architecture, but features only 2 MB level 2 cache and a mediocre clock rate of 2.2 GHz.
Package Size
Height
5.5 in.
6.5 in.
Width
3.93 in.
6 in.
Depth
1.8 in.
2 in.
Weight
1.07 lbs.
1.3 lbs.
Details
Socket
PGA478
PGA478
Lithography
45 nm
45 nm
Type of Processors
Mobile
Mobile
Code Name
Penryn
Penryn
What customers say about "Details"
Intel Pentium T4200 CPU Processor
- I installed this processor without difficulty. Recommend for everybody.
- A good budget option for a laptop. Installed in 10 minutes.
- Sits in the socket well and securely. Cool product from Intel.
- Anyone can install it. Simple socket and good processor.
- An old socket on an old motherboard that is hard to find commercially.
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 CPU Processor
- Great quad core CPU at good price. Good and easy install.
- Installation was a breeze. I like it.
- Easy to install. I recommend this item. Perfect for me.
- Install was simple and easy. Best price and performance value.
- It was too easy to install. Good socket.
Technical Specifications
CPU Cores
2
2
CPU Threads
2
2
Clock Speed
2 GHz
2.2 GHz
Max TDP
35 W
35 W
Max Temperature
105 °C
90 °C
Data Width
64 bits
64 bits
Virtualization Technology
No
No
What customers say about "Technical Specifications"
Intel Pentium T4200 CPU Processor
- It is perfect replacement for my bad CPU. Good speed.
- This is a good option if you are looking for a budget laptop with good power.
- Feel free to buy this chip. It is suitable for all the applications you need.
- I use a laptop to watch videos and listen to music. The processor is perfect for this.
- This is a rather weak processor. For light tasks only.
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 CPU Processor
- I find this processor is fast. Good for my laptop.
- With this CPU my computer is plenty fast.
- Nice price and really fast for basic user.
- Working good, nice and fast. Would recommend.
- Terrible condition. Very slow for my needs.
Cache And Memory Specifications
L1 Cache Size
128 kB
128 kB
L2 Cache Size
1000 kB
2000 kB
Memory Types
DDR3
DDR3
Max Memory Channels
2
2
Max Memory Size
8 GB
Max Memory Bandwidth
6.4 GB/s
What customers say about "Cache And Memory Specifications"
Intel Pentium T4200 CPU Processor
- I really liked this processor. Works well with DD3.
- Good budget processor option. In my laptop, it runs with 3GB of RAM.
- I am pleased with this Intel product. It works stably with my RAM.
- Very small cache size. 1 MB is really not a lot.
- I've had some lags with this processor. Maybe because of the small cache.
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 CPU Processor
- Buys new processor for friends computer. Good memory support on this.
- I don’t have any problems with the CPU. Works well with my DDR3 memory.
- Good with my DDR3 Kingston memory. I like it.
- Amazing value. Has good memory support.
- I recommend this item. Supported my DDR3 memory. I like it! Nice little CPU!
Supported Technologies
Execute Disable Bit / Virus Protection
Yes
Yes
Turbo Boost / Turbo Core
No
No
Enhanced SpeedStep / PowerNow!
Yes
Yes
Hyper-Threading / HyperTransport
No
No
Warranty / Certifications
Manufacturer Warranty
3 year(s)
3 year(s)
Certifications
CE, FCC
CE, FCC
Other Information
Popular Comparisons
Intel Pentium E2160
Intel Pentium E2160
vs
Intel Pentium 4 531
Intel Pentium 4 531
vs
Intel Pentium E2140
Intel Pentium E2140
vs
Intel Pentium 4 630
Intel Pentium 4 630
vs
AMD EPYC 7351P
AMD EPYC 7351P
vs
Intel Core i5-9400
Intel Core i5-9400
vs
AMD EPYC 7551P
AMD EPYC 7551P
vs
Intel Core i7-950
Intel Core i7-950
vs
Intel Core i9-7940X
Intel Core i9-7940X
vs
Intel Core i7-8700K
Intel Core i7-8700K
vs
Intel Core i7-4790K
Intel Core i7-4790K
vs
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
vs
Intel Core i7-6850K
Intel Core i7-6850K
vs
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3
vs
Intel Core i7-4770K
Intel Core i7-4770K
vs